Protecting America’s Arctic: Battling Backlash Against Conservation Efforts 

In the wake of Earth Day, the Biden administration took a significant step forward for environmental conservation by announcing regulations safeguarding 13 million acres in the Western Arctic. This move not only signified a commitment to preserving vital ecosystems – especially around the Arctic’s five Special Areas – but also set the stage for future conservation efforts. However, the path to progress is not always straightforward, especially when political agendas clash with environmental stewardship. 

Within weeks of this Western Arctic regulation finalization, House and Senate Republicans swiftly mobilized to challenge this conservation regulation using a powerful legislative tool known as the Congressional Review Act (CRA). But what exactly is a CRA, and why does it matter in the context of America’s Arctic? 

A CRA empowers Congress to overturn certain federal agency actions, particularly final rules like the recently enacted Western Arctic conservation regulation. Within 60 days of a final rule’s issuance, Congress can introduce a CRA vote to nullify it. If this vote garners support in both the House and the Senate AND receives presidential approval (or overcomes a presidential veto), the rule is effectively revoked. 

What’s concerning is the expedited nature of CRA votes. As privileged motions, they can be brought to the floor with minimal notice, leaving little time for thorough deliberation (which is why you’re just hearing about this from us now). House Republicans, in particular, are poised to exploit this procedural advantage, fueled by dissent from Alaska’s congressional delegation and their allies over the administration’s conservation initiatives. 

The implications of a successful CRA vote are profound. Not only would it derail the Western Arctic conservation regulation, but it would also undermine the Biden administration’s broader climate and conservation agenda.  

Do we expect this CRA to be successful? No. However, the setback of even introducing a CRA underscores the urgency of the moment and the need for proactive engagement on Alaskan conservation from stakeholders and lawmakers moving forward. 

For advocates like us, the fight against this CRA represents a critical opportunity to defend America’s Arctic and demonstrate our commitment to longstanding protections that can’t be easily overturned. By urging Hill champs to oppose the CRA vote, we expect to thwart efforts that would jeopardize vital environmental protections – now and into the future.  

The stakes are high, not just for the Arctic but for future generations and global conservation efforts. America’s Arctic serves as a cornerstone of biodiversity, recreation, and climate resilience, making it imperative to safeguard against short-sighted policy decisions. 

As the political landscape shifts and debates unfold on Capitol Hill, the fate of America’s Arctic faces continual threats. Now is the time for an unwavering commitment to protect one of our planet’s most precious ecosystems. The decisions made today will reverberate for years to come, shaping the future of America’s Arctic and our collective environmental legacy.